Sunday, September 19, 2021

When You Can’t Trust Your Fellow Latter-day Saints

 

My relationship with the Church has been complicated for a long time now. I’ve worked at Church headquarters and suffered the effects of bureaucratic burnout. I deal on a daily basis in my current job at BYU Studies with the complexities and contradictions of LDS history, doctrine, and culture. I’ve learned to navigate these turbulent waters with some degree of equanimity, largely because in the background I’ve always had my ward family, in whose company I’ve felt both accepted and comfortable. Until this summer.

I endured the first part of the pandemic quite well. At work, it was almost as if there was no pandemic at all, except that the parking was fantastic. I went in to BYU every day, with two other colleagues, each of us in a different room, so we felt quite safe. The rest of the staff worked remotely, which worked out just fine. The faculty and students were doing the distance learning thing, so the large Joseph F. Smith Building, where our offices are, was quite empty.

On Sunday, attendance at sacrament meeting was very limited, and my wife and I watched the service at home on the TV, where it was streamed on YouTube. Those who attended, which we did very occasionally, wore masks and practiced social distancing. Second-hour classes were held on Zoom, although Primary was suspended for obvious reasons.

We also practiced great care when we shopped in retail stores, and although we patronized restaurants regularly to support this struggling industry, we did so through takeout, not in-person dining. This was inconvenient, but necessary to preserve public health.

Then things began to open up as the vaccines became available and case numbers dropped significantly. My two colleagues and I continued to go to work, but now others came to the office, although we still held staff meetings on Zoom. My wife and I shopped without masks and even dined inside at a few restaurants and attended a movie theater. At Church, things changed too. The social-distancing guidelines were relaxed, and second-hour classes (including Primary) resumed in person. Things were looking up.

But then the delta variant arrived, and all the numbers went south, for the state of Utah and especially for Utah County, where I live. Why? Because Utah County is heavily LDS and so many Latter-day Saints are Republican, which means they were getting their information from questionable right-wing sources, and they were taught to doubt both science and common sense. They were also taught that their personal freedom was the most important value in the universe. The percentage of the population vaccinated in Utah County, and especially in north Orem, where I live, was abysmally low, and many of the unvaccinated were also anti-maskers. My wife and I still attended sacrament meeting, but we were among just a handful of members who wore masks, even though we had been vaccinated. Some friends of ours who had been vaccinated came down with COVID. Then our elders quorum president and his wife also experienced breakthrough cases. These were not mild cases, although neither couple was hospitalized. Obviously, this delta variant is not something to take lightly. We figured we were doing our part to help stop the spread, especially to the vulnerable children who were too young to be vaccinated. And we felt that even if we weren’t contagious, we were setting the correct example. There was nothing political about this. Our actions were all based on public health guidelines and the statistics that were growing increasingly more alarming.

We were tremendously relieved when on August 12, 2021, the First Presidency finally sent this email to every member:

Dear Brothers and Sisters:

We find ourselves fighting a war against the ravages of COVID-19 and its variants, an unrelenting pandemic. We want to do all we can to limit the spread of these viruses. We know that protection from the diseases they cause can only be achieved by immunizing a very high percentage of the population.

To limit exposure to these viruses, we urge the use of face masks in public meetings whenever social distancing is not possible. To provide personal protection from such severe infections, we urge individuals to be vaccinated. Available vaccines have proven to be both safe and effective.

We can win this war if everyone will follow the wise and thoughtful recommendations of medical experts and government leaders. Please know of our sincere love and great concern for all of God’s children.

The First Presidency

Russell M. Nelson
Dallin H. Oaks
Henry B. Eyring

We thought, surely our fellow ward members will see the wisdom in this and, as the Primary song goes, “follow the prophet.” We were expecting to see a similar email from both our stake president and our bishop, urging members to get vaccinated and resume wearing masks at church meetings. No such messages appeared. So we were curious about what sacrament meeting would look like. We were both pleased and disappointed. Instead of just a handful of members wearing masks, about 50 percent were masked that first Sunday. The great disappointment came when our new bishop, who is a Church employee, appeared on the stand without a mask. At the beginning of the meeting, he came to the pulpit and said, in effect, “You all received an email from the First Presidency this week. We just want to assure you that you have your freedom of choice.” That was it. No encouragement to follow the prophet. No leading by example. Later that week, I sent him an email. He’s a good friend whom we’ve known for many years, so I feel comfortable giving him a piece of my mind. The piece I gave him was this: Never in my life did I expect to see a priesthood leader stand at the pulpit and tell the members, in word and by example, that following the prophet is optional. Sure, we all have our agency, but in the Church we don’t tell people that smoking is just a personal choice, or paying tithing, or being chaste. We encourage people to use their agency to do what is right.

To his credit, he did start wearing a mask to sacrament meeting the next week, but there was no encouragement from the pulpit to follow the guidance of the First Presidency. And in the weeks since that first Sunday after the August 12 email, the numbers wearing masks have decreased even as the numbers of COVID cases in Utah have increased and the ICUs have filled up.

The percentage of Utah County residents who have been fully vaccinated is 44.4. The percentage of north Orem residents who have been fully vaccinated is 42.7. I have no illusions that my ward is an outlier. I think my fellow ward members are pretty average for north Orem. Which means that a large number of them are both unvaccinated and unmasked. I don’t find church to be a very safe place. With the aerosol spread of this virus, any indoor gathering with the unmasked is a potentially dangerous event. The last time I attended Sunday School was shortly before the First Presidency email came. We sat in a poorly ventilated Relief Society room with dozens of unmasked ward members. I didn’t feel safe, even though I’ve been vaccinated and was wearing a mask. I haven’t attended Sunday School since, and I don’t attend elders quorum anymore either, even though it is held in the much larger cultural hall. Part of the reason is that I struggle now being around my fellow ward members.

When I go to church now, I can’t help judging. We all judge. We really can’t help it, and we need to do so for a variety of reasons, one of them being our personal safety. But I look around at all the people who received the same email I did, and I wonder what arguments they use for ignoring both the prophet and the medical professionals who advise them to behave differently than they are. Now, when I see my fellow ward members, I don’t see friends and fellow Saints. I see people I can’t trust. This is difficult for me. No matter what bureaucratic, doctrinal, or historical stumbling blocks I’ve encountered in Mormonism, I’ve always had my ward. But not anymore. What do you do when you can no longer trust your fellow ward members? I still attend sacrament meeting, but it depresses me. Not because of anything said from the pulpit, but because I am surrounded by people I can’t trust.

Some people say that trust has to be earned. They are wrong. Unless we trust each other implicitly, our society doesn’t work. Our economic and social relationships are all based on trust. No, trust doesn’t have to be earned. We generally trust others, within reason, until they prove to us that they cannot be trusted. Unfortunately, I’ve reached that point with my ward. I’ve learned this summer that I can’t trust the majority of them to do the right thing, and when you can’t trust someone to do the right thing, the relationship with that person is broken. I feel broken. My ward has disappointed me in such a fundamental way that I doubt I will ever feel the same toward most members.

I’ve said it before, but it’s still true: many Mormons are more Republican than they are Mormon. The pandemic has only made this more obvious. When a political party goes off the rails to the degree that it encourages its constituents to disbelieve facts and believe instead all sorts of nonsense and lies, it should be abandoned rather than embraced. But this is not happening. The disinformation is too prevalent on the right and too tribal. Ignorance and selfishness have carried the day in the Republican Party and, hence, in many LDS wards. I now am sad when I attend church, and I don’t see this changing anytime soon.

19 comments:

  1. I really don't believe the average Latter-day Saints believes in prophets anymore. My Bishop demonstrated this with his inaction after the First Presidency declaration, as did many other members. This is a deal breaker for me. I feel I am watching the classic film "Invasion of the Body-Snatchers ". Who are these people? They really don't believe what they have espoused for so many years. They are untrustworthy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Pres Nelson used up a lot of his credibility by insisting using the word'Mormon' was a victory for Satan. Apparently the millions of dollars spent on the "I'm a Mormon" campaign (even a huge ad in Times Square!) and then a full movie, "Meet the Mormons" was all spent at the prompting of Satan. Elder Hinckley's talk rebuking Elder Nelson's first attempt at pushing this idea in Oct 1990 general conference was also inspired of Satan. And the apologetics for all the other times prophets and apostles have taught horrific doctrine or said awful things was because they were speaking as a man or just a product of their times. The church really only has itself to blame when a prophet says something that members disagree with, allowing them to justify their reasons for ignoring it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. President Nelson's crusade against the word "Mormon" demonstrated to nearly everyone that the full force of prophetic authority could be mustered behind a topic that Jesus clearly doesn't give two shits about. He shredded the prophetic mantle in pursuit of a name change. The name change and the reversal on the policy regarding baptisms for LGBT youth, in quick succession, greatly harmed his claims to prophetic authority. At the same time, Church members have adopted the mantra of "even prophets make mistakes" to justify the increasingly well-known horrors of Church history...and if old prophets make "mistakes," surely the current prophets do.

      An arrogant, over-reaching prophet, a deeply divided membership, and sudden access to historical truth have all converged to test the limits of prophetic authority in the LDS Church. The results so far are very interesting.

      Delete
    2. I think it's the perfect time to focus on the real name of the church. There's a fun irony in the idea that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints may very well become the flagship of all those who believe in a literal Jesus. Time well tell.

      Jack

      Delete
  3. As a life long republican--really more of a RINO these days--I feel like a man without a country. I too live in Orem--and I can't understand why so many folks seem to resist the First Presidency's counsel on this matter.

    Even so, let's not become too discouraged--things could be a lot worse. I think of Mormon and Moroni; what a horrible situation they were in. Imagine what it was like for those two to live the gospel among a people that were completely devoid of the spirit of God.

    But even in such depraved conditions Mormon encourages his son to stay true with these words of hope from Moroni 9:

    6 And now, my beloved son, notwithstanding their hardness, let us labor diligently; for if we should cease to labor, we should be brought under condemnation; for we have a labor to perform whilst in this tabernacle of clay, that we may conquer the enemy of all righteousness, and rest our souls in the kingdom of God.

    Jack

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Roger for your courage. I would wish to think someone with the life long heritage of faithfulness you have demonstrated would be respected and engaged with on the merits, but I feel sad knowing you will be smeared and maligned and shunned because you have spoken.

    “And if the time comes that the voice of the people doth choose iniquity (or false conspiracy theories or fake pseudoscience), then is the time that the judgments of God will come upon you” (Mosiah 29:26–27).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Roger,
    I think the correct counsel is that people shouls do what's best as directed by the Holy Ghost. For some it may mean getting vaccinated, for others it may mean not to get vaccinated. We can all be prudent though in how we act in public and live safely.
    News and information these days are a funny thing. A person's political leaning will often sway their approach to what sources they get their news and information. It's a no-brainer that one can get whatever angle they are looking for from news outlets and use it as ammunition against the other.
    I am in the bishopric in my ward and we have prayed about this and I feel we have been guided by the Holy Ghost through this whole process. In the first wave of the pandemic, after we were allowed back in church we had very strict guidelines and procedures. We were social distancing, sanitizing everything, having multiple sacrament meetings to ensure safety measures. Then as warm weather came and the virus waned our church opened up in phases as per Idaho protocol and now we are back to full strength, full meetings, etc. As leaders on the stand we wear masks more of a symbol or acknowledgement of the pandemic but in reality we feel the masks aren't accomplishing much of anything. Only maybe 20% of the members wear masks and no one really socially distances anymore. And yet, as led by the Holy Ghost, we feel we are protected and moving in the right direction. As far as I am aware, we have had only one member die of covid-19 complications (several comorbidities) during this whole ordeal. That person was a completely inactive person who never really left home except for doctor appointments.
    No one in our ward that actively attends church that I am aware of has been hospitalized during this whole pandemic. Many of them have gotten sick but almost entirely this was during the first wave.
    We do have those complainers and those who refuse to come to church but the reality of it as far as I see it is that amongst those who do come to church, they are very well protected as proved by the fact that none were hospitalized and none have died. We have roughly 160-180 regular attending members. Probably only about half of the adults are vaccinated. So, when I look at the numbers as those immediately around me in close contact, there is a 100% net safety rating from severe infection or death. My fellow brothers and sisters in our ward notice this too I believe because they feel protected enough to crowd together in our small church and live normally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I think the correct counsel is that people shouls do what's best as directed by the Holy Ghost. For some it may mean getting vaccinated, for others it may mean not to get vaccinated. We can all be prudent though in how we act in public and live safely."

      As a bishop do you give that same advice regarding other prophetic utterances? Word of wisdom? Law of chastity? In your congregation is tithing left to personal revelation?

      Isn't it weird how a prophet's words are binding until they conflict with our personal beliefs? The conflicting instructions suddenly become subject to the confirmation of the Holy Ghost.

      Delete
    2. I appreciate your reliance on the Holy Ghost, but as I've written on this blog before, in my experience deciphering spiritual promptings is devilishly difficult. Half the time I'm dead wrong, and I've observed the same phenomenon for Church leaders, even at the highest level. But this isn't a situation for personal revelation. This is a pandemic that has now killed more Americans than the Spanish flu did. One in every 500 Americans is now dead from COVID. We should be done with this pandemic, except for all the people who are getting misinformation through their "channels." The First Presidency rarely sends out a plea like the one we received in August, and I can tell you from personal communication with a member of the Twelve I know that the General Authorities are none too happy with the response of the members. Today the First Presidency sent out another plea. This isn't just a matter of personal freedom. It's a matter of life and death for many people. And I'm pretty sure the Holy Ghost isn't going to tell you to ignore the prophet on this one.

      Delete
  6. Fear is a powerful motivator. And we're often blind to its influence when it's active. Be careful not to let it control you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for a good read. I definitely understand what you're feeling.

    I will say though that I find a lot of people who lean on the right, to whatever spectrum, do listen to some very valid and authentic advice from credible and trusted sources (medical experts) who have very reasonable arguments. And I think the greater harm being done during this pandemic is not people getting sick, but people getting completely dehumanized and shut down because we judge them. So people are getting marginalized -- even censored (warning: slippery slope) -- because their concerns and questions differ, or they do uphold very plausible arguments against the popular scientific conclusions.

    For the record, I support vaccine development. Numbers are improving because of them. There is more that can be done outside of vaccines too. And we know this because of brave medical experts who risked their careers and reputations to speak up about their genuine findings that contradict what we generally accept as the truth, and that sometimes even offer up more data/analysis and the process of getting to those conclusions, as opposed to just being given some conclusions, where we don't know what testing or science has actually taken place to support certain decisions.

    I try to be as very level-headed and emotionally detached as humanly possible, constantly praying to know what is true and not to be deceived.

    My main point in typing this comment up is to say people have very valid reasons to disagree, and their information contains just as much a mix of truth and error as there is on "the other political side" (this should not be a political issue, something is very wrong). You have well established organizations saying one thing, and you have individuals who understand the threat of opposing what they say saying another. And it's not always as black and white either, most times they actually compliment each other, because they're filling in the gaps of logic that has been missed or left out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simple answer: How many people do you know or know of who have died from taking the vaccine? How many people have died or are experiencing long COVID from contracting the virus? This is a no-brainer. Literally.

      Delete
    2. I understand your point, and I agree with what you're trying to say. Clearly, the chance of dying from the vaccine is much smaller compared to the number as a whole of people dying from COVID.

      But here's also a no-brainer, if we want to put it that way. If vaccines work the way we're told and we generally believe, why do we have to worry about if others get the vaccine? Or put another way, why can't we allow others to choose their risk of death? If you're vaccinated, then you have nothing to worry about -- right?

      People who claim they are listening to the science also shut down any actual valid scientific studies done on these alternative/pre-existing drugs, such as Ivermectin (did someone say HORSE DEWORMER) and Hydroxychloroquine (+ zinc). When Japan announced that they're going to start utilizing Ivermectin after many studies, treating early COVID patients, then what's this about? And what about the question "what are the qualities/health attributes of those that die from COVID", generally boiling down to: it's those with comorbidities, and that's something that can 'generally' be helped out, so that they're not in the danger zone of dying from COVID.

      The whole argument about "it's the vaccine or you're a heathen" is discriminatory, dehumanizing, controlling, and one-sided. People aren't satisfied with "listen to the experts" because they're not brought along with the findings of how the solution came to be. And they're discouraged to even question -- so that there's no safe place to learn for themselves what the science actually is. People want the truth, people want to trust. But people are being quite forcefully fed to believe this one thing when they're not allowed to learn/question for themselves how the vaccine is the right choice. And any situation where someone is being belittled because they want to speak up about their concerns is never going to end well.

      So let people decide for themselves. I don't think I'm going to get any side effects from the vaccine. I'm not concerned. But if vaccines work the way they're advertised, then the people who choose to get vaccinated are safe forever (let's not talk about all the times when people still got COVID after the vaccine anyway?) and the people that don't get vaccinated choose to take the risk of getting it spread to them.

      Trust that there actually are people out there who have valid concerns, who really are trying to understand and get their questions answered. The pressure behind the vaccine is absurd, we've never seen anything like it. And because of such a strong reaction, I think it's only sensible that people are hesitant.

      I'm open to having my mind changed -- I'm still searching for the truth and doing my best to look at all the components to this issue. It's not so binary as we might think.

      Delete
  8. Please buy lots of bubble wrap to protect yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I live in Sandy and have experienced a very similar ward situation, and personal reaction with loss of trust and ward community. Thanks for helping me know I'm not alone in Utah, even though it feels like it sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for writing this. We have had the same experience as you in our area, which is far outside of Utah, but also a very conservative state.

    Our stake leaders sent out a letter in August, basically saying that we shouldn't speak about Covid in our meetings or quote the 1st Presidency letter. Basically, they wanted to sweep this whole problem under the rug in the name of "unity." I understand that they want to avoid contention and division, but not following prophetic counsel is not the method I would advise towards that end. Unity comes from collective obedience to God and selfless sacrifice for others.

    Our stake is about 5 percent masked, and based on community numbers, I would guess 40 percent vaccinated at most. When my daughter went to girls camp for our ward, I thought to ask if she could share a cabin with other vaccinated girls. It turns out only 1 other girl in our ward was vaccinated out of 20 girls. Meanwhile, a girl whose mom was currently sick with Covid was sent to camp and they never mentioned it to the leaders.

    As I write this, our area currently has one of the largest Covid outbreaks in the country. Our little hospital is running at 135 percent capacity. Many stake members have been hospitalized. Meanwhile, we have other stake members actively organizing public protests against masks and vaccines. Our community is about 5 percent members and everyone knows who they are, so you can imagine my dismay at the example this sets in our community.

    I hadn't thought of it before as a trust issue, but it is. I don't trust my leaders to lead by example. I don't trust my ward members to follow the prophet or sacrifice for the common good. I don't trust my kids at youth activities because I know their leaders won't follow guidelines. I don't trust myself to go to church in person without wanting to cry. I don't feel afraid or fearful of this virus. I feel afraid that I won't be able to forget and return to how things were before.

    I have a good friend that has left the church because she feels the same as I do. I can really sympathize with her, though I disagree with her path. Meanwhile, those not following the prophet are being handled with kid gloves so they won't leave. It shouldn't be this way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good thoughts.

      A quote from Elder D. Todd Christofferson, “At the same time it should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. It is commonly understood in the Church that a statement made by one leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, not meant to be official or binding for the whole Church. The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that “a prophet [is] a prophet only when he [is] acting as such.” (The Doctrine of Christ ~ April 2012)

      A prophet is a prophet when he relays direct revelation or a vision from the Lord and tells you it’s a vision or a revelation. The rest of the time, he speaks as a man. Yes, he is inspired, chosen, our leader, and his understanding is ahead of the curve. Nonetheless, mistakes happen, and they get worked through and learned from. Line upon line ~ precept upon precept is not only an individual process; it is also a collective process for the whole Church.

      Delete
  11. So the correct teaching, that prophets are human and fallible, is now being used to discount a formal and direct message from the First Presidency?

    ReplyDelete