I’m going to quote three “conservatives”
in this column. I want you to know this up front so that you don’t mistake them
for “liberals.” Jennifer Rubin is a conservative political columnist for the Washington
Post. Michael Gerson is an op-ed columnist for the Washington Post
who was George W. Bush’s chief speech writer. Stuart Stevens is a Republican
political consultant who worked on the election campaigns of four Republican
presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney. The question they address, in one
form or another, is what it means to be a conservative in today’s Republican Party.
Another way to frame this question is, what on earth happened to the Republican
Party? I’ll start with Rubin, since she introduces the question most directly.
“Under Trump, the term ‘conservative’
has become almost meaningless, in large part because the party that identifies
with conservatism has become a cult of personality extolling whatever position
Trump latches upon, no matter how incoherent or repulsive. Good ‘conservatives’
are supposed to believe that family separation is an acceptable border policy,
that the Justice Department should serve the president’s political interests
and that developing a nationwide testing and tracing program is the
responsibility of states, not the federal government (although the feds’
exercise of the police power is necessary).
“‘Conservatism’ now is a chaotic
blend of right-wing nationalism, conspiracy theories, plutocratic economics,
cronyism, protectionism, realpolitik foreign policy and repudiation of
objective reality. When Trump departs, it is far from clear whether it will
remain so, revert to pure anti-government libertarianism (which has a small
constituency aside from donors and hard-line activists) or morph into something
else entirely.”1
In other words, conservatism has
become something conservatives from a decade or two ago would not recognize at
all, even though they were already on the path that eventually led them to
follow a self-absorbed demagogue. Michael Gerson expands on this theme,
explaining why, in order to save the conservative movement, Republicans need to
lose this next election BIG.
“This is the main reason that
Republicans—in the Oval Office, in the Senate, in the House—must lose, and lose
decisively. Trump has made national Republicans fully complicit in his revolt
against American principles. Party loyalty now consists of defending the
indefensible. By the nature of our constitutional order, a firm decision
against bigotry is an entry-level commitment of American politics. Trump’s
pervasive influence among Republicans has necessitated their repudiation.
“The president is ignorant of
America’s history, indifferent to its ideals and blind to the nobility of the
political enterprise. For most elected Republicans, the stain of complicity is
probably indelible. But a presidential election can be a window—a short window—for
recovery and renewal. Assuming our nation still has ambitions higher than the
Suburban Lifestyle Dream.”2 This last term refers to an openly
racist appeal Trump made this past week to his white supremacist followers who
want to keep their neighborhoods segregated.
Stuart Stevens does not just take
issue with where the Republican Party has gone; he also takes partial credit
for it and explains that the GOP did not begin its long slide from principle
with their embrace of Trump. Trump was merely the destination for which they
were already heading. Stevens was just too late to see it, so he is trying to
make amends now, partly by writing a book that outlines the long slide.
“Reading Mr. Bush’s 2000 acceptance
speech at the Republican National Convention now is like stumbling across
a document from a lost civilization, with its calls for humility, service and
compassion. That message couldn’t attract 20 percent in a Republican
presidential primary today. If there really was a battle for the soul of the
Republican Party, we lost.
“There is a collective blame to be
shared by those of us who have created the modern Republican Party that has so
egregiously betrayed the principles it claimed to represent. My j’accuse [bitter
denunciation] is against us all, not a few individuals who were the most
egregious.
“How did this happen? How do you
abandon deeply held beliefs about character, personal responsibility, foreign
policy and the national debt in a matter of months? You don’t. The obvious
answer is those beliefs weren’t deeply held. What others and I thought were
bedrock values turned out to be mere marketing slogans easily replaced.”3
I have been harping on this theme
for a long time now. It’s nice to see some conservatives finally agreeing. What
they are saying is that the Republican Party bailed on conservative principles
long ago, and so now being “conservative” is almost meaningless. When a major
political party gives up any serious attempt at policy and opts for sloganeering
instead of governing, you get what we have in the GOP today: incompetence, conspiracy
theories and quack science instead of expertise, wholesale corruption, and a
total disconnect with society’s real needs and concerns (for instance, global
warming, racism, economic inequality, affordable health care for all Americans,
and, oh, I hear there’s a pandemic going round).
Personally, I don’t think the
Republican Party can be saved. Falling in line with Trump was the final nail in
the coffin. We do, however, need a conservative party that is right of center
(not right off the cliff in wingnut territory), serious about science, more
concerned with society’s needs than with holding onto power, and determined to
do the hard work of creating workable policy and achieving hard-won compromise
on complex issues rather than playing the sort of scorched-earth partisanship
that Newt Gingrich ushered in and Mitch McConnell perfected. We need such a
party, but I don’t think the current crop of Republicans in Power are capable
of this. If I were Republican, I’d start with John Kasich and Mitt Romney and a
few others who haven’t drunk the “conservative” Kool-Aid and start from the ground
up. Maybe then the “conservatives” might be able to figure out again what it
means to be conservative.
__________________
1. Jennifer
Rubin, “Are You a Conservative? It’s a Trick Question,” Washington Post,
July 27, 2020.
2. Michael
Gerson, “Trump Has Made Republicans Complicit in His Revolt against American
Principles,” Washington Post, July 30, 2020.
3. Stuart
Stevens, “We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Souls Long Ago,” New
York Times, July 30, 2020.
It seems like the country has split into thirds: There are the Trumpists ("incompetence, conspiracy theories and quack science instead of expertise, wholesale corruption, and a total disconnect with society’s real needs and concerns") who mostly care about cruelty toward their enemies. The conservatives who don't want to tear down all the country's traditions, such as respect for the rule of law - this group is represented by what were once Eisenhower Republicans, but are now the corporate or moderate Democrats. Finally, you have the people who actually want to seriously address problems such as "global warming, racism, economic inequality, affordable health care for all Americans". This is a large group of citizens, but unfortunately, is represented by only a few elected officials such as Bernie Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, etc.
ReplyDeleteI am most anxious to see where Utah's Electoral College votes go this year. If it goes as I expect it to go, I will bid a final fond farewell to so-called powers of discernment among the Priesthood holders in "Zion".
ReplyDeleteIs there a difference? Seems to me if you are not conservative, you have no place in today's Republican Party.
ReplyDelete