A friend sent me a link to an article on the ZME Science website that I found both fascinating and disturbing.
I checked out ZME to see what kind of reviews it gets. Turns out that ZME is
based in Romania but publishes news on science in English. A media bias website
considers it factual and reliable, albeit pro-science (which is good). This
particular article, “This Study Finds a Chilling Link between Personality Type
and Trump Support,” by Tudor Tarita, dated July 30, 2025, reports the results
of a study led by University of North Texas psychologist Craig Neumann.
The article begins with this
teaser: “In the years since Donald Trump emerged as the face of American
conservatism, psychologists have grappled with a vexing question: why do so
many Americans remain loyal to a morally questionable leader? Donald
Trump has made tens of thousands of false or misleading claims, he
had an affair with an adult star, and consistently misused donations,
and that’s just the tip of the iceberg; yet, he maintains a cult-like loyal
following.” Since the study, Trump has conducted a wholesale attack on the
institutions of democracy, unleashed a cruel deportation crusade, and has
offended most of our former allies, and that’s still the tip of the iceberg.
And yet his support among the MAGA faithful remains strong, although his
overall approval rating is tanking. So, what explains this fervent devotion
among the MAGAts? (No, that’s not a misprint. And they really are feasting upon
the rotting corpse of the Republican Party.)
Neumann’s study was published in
July in the Journal of Research in Personality and suggests that at
least “part of the answer may lie deep within the personalities of his
supporters. . . . The study analyzed responses from over 9,000 U.S. adults in
two large surveys conducted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants completed questionnaires that assessed their political beliefs,
empathy levels, and personality traits. The results consistently showed a
pattern: the more favorably someone rated Trump, the more likely they were to
display traits like narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—traits
grouped under what researchers call a malevolent disposition.” But
the reverse was also true. “Participants who scored higher on benevolent traits
like humanism, faith in humanity, and respect for others tended to oppose Trump
and lean politically liberal.”
Interestingly, these results were
consistent across gender and racial groups, as well as income, education, age,
and minority status. There were some differences, though. “White men who scored
higher on psychopathic traits also showed stronger support for Trump and
conservative ideology. Among men of minority status, however, psychopathy did
not predict political ideology. This variation, researchers propose, could stem
from differing lived experiences with social power, privilege, and
marginalization.” This makes sense, and I’ll extrapolate on later on what this
may mean for Latter-day Saints.
“The study also looked at empathy,
and the findings were disturbing once again. Trump supporters reported
significantly lower levels of affective empathy (emotional concern for others)
and higher levels of dissonant empathy (enjoyment of others’ pain). Interestingly,
their ability to understand how others feel (cognitive empathy) remained
intact. In other words, they know what others are feeling, they simply appear
to care less, on average. They enjoy others’ pain more as well. This adds a
chilling nuance to the political landscape. It’s not that supporters of Trump
can’t understand suffering—it’s that they may find it unimportant, or even
gratifying.”
Tarita points out that psychologists
have long noticed a link between conservative ideology and authoritarianism,
but this new study extends that link to more extreme traits like “callousness
and lack of empathy.” Trump’s specific approach to politics, however, is not
traditional conservatism. There is a cruelty in Trump, seen in such acts as
mocking disabled reporters and separating children from their parents, that
speaks of a wanton disregard for other people, a clear indication of psychopathic
tendencies. “The fact that so many people view these actions positively,” says
Tarita, “reflects something deeper than policy preference. It says that many people
agree with such dark acts.”
But what about traits on the other
end of the spectrum, benevolent traits? The study indicated that “these traits
were strongly linked with liberal political beliefs and a rejection of Trump. .
. . These individuals exhibited a distinct psychological orientation rooted in
affiliation, care, and prosocial behavior. In contrast, Trump supporters showed
the opposite pattern: higher scores on malevolent traits and lower on
benevolent ones, shaping their political identity.”
Predictably, men were more likely
to display malevolent traits and to more strongly support Trump. Women, on the
other hand, were more benevolent and “showed weaker links between personality
and politics.”
The authors of the study “are
careful to stress that their findings reflect group averages, not individual
labels. . . . Still, the patterns are meaningful.”
This brings me to my main
question. What does this study say about LDS support for Trump? It would be interesting
to conduct a similar survey among just Latter-day Saints. Support among Mormons
for Trump has been weaker than for other Republican candidates, but, still,
they voted overwhelmingly for the convicted felon over the career prosecutor in
the 2024 election. I know many Latter-day Saints who support Trump, despite
everything they know about him. I know ever more who held their noses and voted
for Trump because they somehow imagine that things would be even worse under
any Democratic president. (I’d love to see a study on how watching Fox News affects
LDS political beliefs.) Most of these Trump-voting or Trump-supporting
Latter-day Saints are not psychopaths. They are good Mormons, as far as I can
tell. Of course, I don’t know what goes on in the hearts of my fellow Church
members, but I know enough to believe that they would not reflect the results
of this study.
My own suspicion is that many LDS
voters have been brainwashed for so many years (thanks, ETB) into thinking that
Democrats are evil, perhaps primarily because of one particular issue—abortion—that they cannot imagine
themselves voting for a Democrat. My own parents, habitual Fox News viewers,
probably fell into that camp. My mom died in 2013, though, so she never had a
chance to vote for or against Trump (but she was very concerned about all of “Obama’s
czars,” apparently something she had heard on Fox). Before my dad’s dementia
set in (sometime after he broke his hip in 2020), he was a Republican but not a Trump fan (“I wish
he’d just keep his mouth shut”). Still, I wonder how my dad voted in 2016. I
never asked.
What I find most striking about
this study is that Trump’s most ardent support group is Evangelical Christians.
This study indicates that, by and large, most of these supporters have
personality traits that are completely at odds with the traits Jesus both
demonstrated and encouraged his followers to embrace. This is a damning sign
that Christianity is failing its adherents at a very fundamental level. And
Trump’s behavior in his second rodeo, after the surveys used in this study were
all completed, is far more extreme than during his first term in office. So,
his supporters are excusing much more egregious behavior and policies (if we
can call them that) this time around. But the results of this study indicate
that Trump’s supporters are not just gullible. They haven’t just been duped by
Fox News and the endless disinformation streaming out of the Trump propaganda
machine. Many of them actually embrace and enjoy the malevolence and cruelty
that Trump has brought to the Republican Party.
How, I ask yet again, can any
Latter-day Saint or any would-be Christian be a Republican in Trump’s America?
Very interesting. Consider that Jesus said, "By this shall ye know my disciples, that they love one another," and 1 Cor. 13 and the famous hymn to Charity:
ReplyDeleteCharity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
What is the opposite?
The opposite of Christ does not suffer long, and is unkind, envieth whoever has what it wants, vaunteth itself constantly, and is notably puffed up,
Behaves unseemly, always seeking its own gain, is easily provoked, and thinks evil of anyone who opposes their ambitions and desires, or is just different
Rejoices in getting away with whatever it wants to do, and bitterly opposes any attempts to call it to account,
Will not put up with anything, believes only what it wants to hear, hopes only for personal gain and power, so that it will never have to endure anything difficult or unpleasant.
The precision of the negative match to Trump by itself has implications for the lack of self reflection in Evangelical support for Trump. But we can something like it with the lesser but still notable Utah vote. Consider an inversion of D&C 121 on how authority ought to behave.
Power or influence can be maintained by coercion, impatience, brutality, pride, and feigned love. By transactional interactions, and by using rhetoric effectively and saying whatever flatters enough people of the right sort to gain and keep a following, and by projecting our own guilt onto other people, we can paint them as embodying all corruption, and serve our own agenda and ambition at all times.
Reproving constantly and without concern for facts, when moved upon by pride and vanity and ambition, and then afterwards showing an increase of love towards the flag and your allies, that we may be united against whomever we decide is an enemy, whomever we designate as scapegoat, to blame for all our problems and distract attention from our shortcomings,
That people may know better than to criticize or cross you for fear of what will happen to them
Let thy bowels be full of charity to your allies, plot revenge upon your enemies, and let ambition and pride garnish thy thoughts unceasingly, and then shall thy confidence wax strong in the presence of adoring crowds and sycophants.
It's just sad. I reflect that Jesus said that judgement, criticism, discernment, ought to begin with self-criticism, removing the beams in our own eyes. I notice that Trump responds to criticism with projection, accusing his critics of the things he himself demonstrates, and in do doing always shows a notable lack of self awareness and self reflection.
In 2016, I was surprised and disappointed that my friends and neighbors couldn't see how bad Trump was. In 2024, I was devastated that they could see but didn't care how bad Trump was.
ReplyDelete