Since it’s income
tax day, let’s talk taxes. Of course nobody likes to pay taxes, but for
Republicans, taxes are one of the great evils of the world (in spite of all the
stuff they want to spend money on). And since they are in control in
Washington, they are threatening tax reform once again, and if they can get the
Freedom Caucus to fall in line, maybe they’ll be able to inflict some damage.
And I mean damage.
You might
remember last time the Republicans were in charge, we paid for two wars and
Medicare Part D with tax cuts. I think that’s what they call “fiscal
conservatism.” The arithmetic doesn’t work out very well, but if you get the
ideology right, who cares about the math? There are always Paul Ryan’s magic
asterisks to make all the numbers add up, sort of.
Then we had the Great
Recession, which pumped up the debt to truly impressive levels. Of course,
Obama came into office in the middle of this mess, so of course the Republicans
tried to pin all the debt on him. The truth, of course, is that in a recession,
you need government to step in and keep the ship afloat, and with so many
people unemployed, tax revenues also drop precipitously, all of which creates
more debt. Nevertheless, the “deficit scolds,” as Paul Krugman calls them, were
out in force. The big issue for Republicans all during Obama’s first term and
half of the second was the massive debt that was drowning America. What they
never would admit is that if we hadn’t added a good deal of stimulus when
things were awful, it would have gotten a lot worse. Obama generally gets very
high marks for his handling of the economy during the late Great Recession. But
accumulating debt under those circumstances is pretty much unavoidable.
Now that the
economy is humming along, though, we should be trying to build up a surplus. You’d
think that would be a high priority for so-called fiscal conservatives. Instead,
what do we hear from the Republicans? Well, Trump wants a $1 trillion
investment in infrastructure. This would actually be a good idea. Our
infrastructure is crumbling. But how do the Republicans propose to pay for this
(and other conservative priorities, such as building up an already bloated
military and constructing a totally unnecessary wall on half of our southern
border)? You guessed it. With tax cuts that primarily benefit the wealthy. Is
anyone surprised by this? Of course not. It’s how Republicans operate. They
accuse the Democrats of “tax and spend.” All I can say is that “tax and spend”
makes a whole lot more sense than “cut taxes and spend.” For some reason, when
the Republicans are in power, the debt doesn’t seem to matter at all. Oh, Trump
wants to slash spending in important but relatively inexpensive departments and
agencies, but all those savings would go to the military, so the net effect is
zero. And this week he has actually admitted that repealing Obamacare is really
about setting the stage for “tax reform.” It’s not about providing health care
for Americans. It’s about tax cuts. At least he’s honest about one thing.
I do agree with
the deficit scolds in principle, if not in either timing or methodology. Our
debt is too high and can and should be reduced. But it cannot be reduced
through tax cuts. That is just obstinacy and absurd ideology and arithmetic
deficiency. To put this in some sort of historical perspective, let’s look at
top marginal tax rates over time. To save space, I will list only the years
when the rate changed.
1940
|
81.0%
|
1942
|
88.0%
|
1944
|
94.0%
|
1946
|
86.45%
|
1948
|
82.13%
|
1950
|
84.36%
|
1951
|
91.0%
|
1952
|
92.0%
|
1954
|
91.0%
|
1964
|
77.0%
|
1965
|
70.0%
|
1968
|
75.25%
|
1969
|
77.0%
|
1970
|
71.75%
|
1971
|
70.0%
|
1981
|
69.13%
|
1982
|
50.0%
|
1987
|
38.5%
|
1988
|
28.0%
|
1991
|
31.0%
|
1993
|
39.6%
|
2001
|
39.1%
|
2002
|
38.6%
|
2003
|
35.0%
|
2013
|
39.6%
|
A couple of
things are obvious. First, when we needed to pay off our World War II debt, we
weren’t afraid to require more of the wealthy. Second, if you look at the
national debt, it predictably began to rise with the Reagan tax cuts of the
1980s that took our top marginal rate from almost 70 percent to 28 percent. And
once you cut taxes, it is extremely difficult to increase them. In spite of the
massive debt, we’ve managed only a measly 4.6 percent increase in the past 14
years.
Hidden in this
simplified chart are the myriad tax loopholes that combine with these nominal
rates to produce effective tax rates
for the wealthy that are quite a bit lower than these figures. Additionally,
the capital gains tax rate is 15 percent, which applies to a large share of the
income earned by the wealthy. This is why Warren Buffett complained about
paying a lower tax rate than his secretary.
So, if we were
really serious about reining in our massive national debt, we would enact laws
to affect three different elements of the tax code. We would (1) increase top
marginal rates to at least pre-Reagan levels, (2) get rid of loopholes that
skew the system in favor of the wealthy, and (3) increase the capital gains
rate to at least 35 percent, preferably higher. If you think this is drastic,
well, just look at the debt we’ve accumulated by playing the silly supply-side
game. We’ve been at it for 35 years now, and it doesn’t work. Time to deep-six
this awful legacy of Ronald Reagan.
Now, another
point about taxes. One piece of misinformation we hear quite often is that
Americans are overtaxed compared to other countries. This is simply not true.
The OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) keeps track
of total tax revenue in participating countries as a percentage of GDP. Here
are the figures for 2015 (except for Australia, Japan, and Poland, which were
unavailable, so I inserted 2014 figures).
Australia
|
27.8
|
Austria
|
43.5
|
Belgium
|
44.8
|
Canada
|
31.9
|
Chile
|
20.7
|
Czech
Republic
|
33.5
|
Denmark
|
46.6
|
Estonia
|
33.6
|
Finland
|
44.0
|
France
|
45.5
|
Germany
|
36.9
|
Greece
|
36.8
|
Hungary
|
39.4
|
Iceland
|
37.1
|
Ireland
|
23.6
|
Israel
|
31.4
|
Italy
|
43.3
|
Japan
|
32.0
|
Korea
|
25.3
|
Latvia
|
29.0
|
Luxembourg
|
37.0
|
Mexico
|
17.4
|
Netherlands
|
37.8
|
New
Zealand
|
32.8
|
Norway
|
38.1
|
Poland
|
32.1
|
Portugal
|
34.5
|
Slovak
Republic
|
32.3
|
Slovenia
|
36.6
|
Spain
|
33.8
|
Sweden
|
43.3
|
Switzerland
|
27.9
|
Turkey
|
30.0
|
United
Kingdom
|
32.5
|
United
States
|
26.4
|
OECD
Average
|
34.3
|
As you can see, of
the 35 member countries, only Chile, Ireland, Korea, and Mexico pay lower
taxes, on average, than Americans. We pay 7.9 percent less than the OECD
average. We want government to do lots of stuff for us. We just don’t want to
pay for it. So we’re not really overtaxed. We are 3.4 percent higher than we
were in 2009, in the midst of the Great Recession, but that was an anomaly.
Finally, I can’t
let income tax day pass without bringing up the fact that Donald Trump has
broken his promise to release his tax returns. Of course his statements over
time are a moving target. Now he claims that Americans don’t care, but a recent
poll says otherwise. Three-quarters of those polled want him to release his
returns. And there is probably good reason why he never will. It may have a lot
to do with the Russian connection. We’ll really never know unless Congress,
which has the power to do so, requests them from the IRS. Of course, this will
never happen as long as Trump’s enablers control both houses of Congress. But
the way things are going, that could change in 2018. Stay tuned.
Oh, and happy
income tax day.
No comments:
Post a Comment