In honor of the fortieth anniversary of the
announcement of the revelation that ended one of the two LDS priesthood bans, I
am posting here a few paragraphs from the second of my two articles on
priesthood and authority that Dialogue
is in the process of publishing. The first appeared in the most recent issue
(vol. 51, no. 1). The second will appear in the next issue (vol. 51, no. 2).
I have a
confession to make. I grew up a racist. No, I wasn’t a member of the junior Ku
Klux Klan. But I grew up in North Ogden, Utah, a very Mormon suburb of Ogden. I
attended Weber High School. There was not one black student in the entire
school of 1,500 students. We had maybe three or four Asian-Americans, a couple
of Native Americans, and perhaps a couple of Hispanics (I don’t think either of
them spoke Spanish). We did have a few genuine cowboys, but that’s another
ethnic category altogether. In short, this was a very, very Caucasian school.
Lily white. The student body came from the suburbs north of Ogden, the farming
communities west of Ogden, and the frozen villages over the mountains in Ogden
Valley where David O. McKay grew up. To my knowledge, I did not meet a black
person until I played high school basketball against Bonneville High, and even
then my only interaction with my black opponent was maybe a foul or two. We
didn’t strike up a conversation during free throws. So I grew up believing the
racial stereotypes that prevailed in a school such as Weber in the early 1970s.
And I am not too proud to admit that I likely used a racial slur or two. This
was simply the culture I grew up in. It was based on ignorance.
Then I was called
on a mission to Germany. In my second assignment, we had a black member in the
ward. He was a sweet, humble man from the Ivory Coast who accepted the fact
that he couldn’t hold the priesthood. He impressed me, even though he spoke
very meager German and English. Later, in my fourth assignment, my companion
and I were street contacting in the city one day and spoke with a blond-haired
German farmer who told us we could visit him at his home. We bicycled out into
the countryside east of town one day and found an ancient farmhouse with an
attached barn and a heavy thatched roof. We knocked on the door, and Hans invited
us in. He then introduced us to his wife, Josephine, who hailed from Ghana.
What a shock. As it turned out, he was as spiritually alive as a piece of
petrified wood. She was very interested in our message. So we began teaching
them, and soon Josephine told us she had some friends who would be interested.
Her friends were
Leo and his wife (whose name I can’t remember). They were from Nigeria, and Leo
was attending the university in Hamburg. Leo was perhaps the most Christlike
man I had ever met. I knew instantly that he was a better Christian than I
would ever be. He was intensely interested in our message and soon developed a
conviction that Joseph Smith was a prophet. This was 1977. We knew we were not
supposed to actively proselytize black people, so we were careful in our
teaching. I counseled with the mission president a couple of times. I remember
two things he said. First, “Elder Terry, I’m glad this is your problem and not
mine.” I think he meant this simply as a vote of confidence that I would handle
the situation with care. Second, “Whatever you do, don’t offend the Lord.”
Well, that gave me something to think about.
We taught our
three black investigators slowly and carefully, and we eventually reached the
point where we had to tell them about the priesthood ban. I think the most
difficult day of my mission was the day I had to tell Leo that he couldn’t hold
the priesthood. He took it hard and wanted to know why. So we opened up the
Pearl of Great Price and read a bit. We tried to explain how he and his people
had been fence-sitters in the premortal world. We taught him about the blood of
Cain that he obviously had running through his veins and the curse that
attended it. In other words, we taught him all the standard LDS rationales for
the priesthood ban. And everything we taught him was false.
Fast forward now
a little more than a year into the future. It is June 1978, and I am teaching
German-speaking missionaries at the MTC (it may have still been called the LTM
at that point). One day, after teaching, I bounced on over to the teachers’
lounge. As I was entering the building, another teacher passed me and said,
somewhat excitedly, “Have you heard the news? Blacks can have the priesthood.”
Something in the way he said it made me think he was joking. I replied, “That’s
not funny.” He insisted, “No, I’m serious. President Kimball’s had a
revelation.” I ran out to my car and turned on the radio, and of course it was
the only thing everyone was talking about. I sat there in that hot car and
wept. I wept for the change, and I wept for Leo.
Fast forward
again to 2007. I had been working for BYU Studies for just over a year. I was
reading Ed Kimball’s biography of his father’s years as Church president, Lengthen Your Stride. But I wasn’t
reading the Deseret Book version. I was reading the longer account that was on
the CD pocketed inside the back cover. BYU Studies had edited and prepared the
CD. In that version, I found four chapters describing in great detail the
history of the priesthood ban and the events surrounding the revelation. Ed had
access to his father’s journals, so this was possibly the most complete and
moving version of these events that will ever be written. I said to myself, “We
need to get this out where people will read it.” I knew few would take time to
read the longer version of the book on the CD. So I combined those four
chapters into a long article, worked with Ed to make sure he was happy with it,
and published it in BYU Studies as “Spencer W. Kimball and the Revelation on
Priesthood.”1 It is an incredible account and is available free for
download at the BYU Studies website. Over the years, as I have studied and
contemplated the reason it took so long for this change to come, I, along with
others, have reached the conclusion that it did not come earlier because,
essentially, the Church wasn’t ready for it. The members, not the Lord, were
quite likely the reason for the delay. David O. McKay prayed about this issue
frequently during his administration and was eventually told, “with no
discussion, not to bring the subject up with the Lord again; that the time will
come, but it will not be my time, and to leave the subject alone.”2
My own suspicion is that there were too many Mormons who shared the culturally
embedded racism that I grew up with. It was only after the hard-fought gains
made through the civil rights movement that much of this racism dissipated. My
views changed because of Josephine and Leo. By 1978, enough Latter-day Saints
were ready for the change that there were celebrations in the streets and many
prayers of gratitude from Saints in all walks of life. The Church, as a whole,
was ready in 1978.3
As a postscript here, let me mention that I
learned later that Josephine had joined the Church but had not stayed with it.
When I was working at Church magazines, I had access to membership information
if it was relevant to a story. What a story it would make, I thought, if Leo
had joined the Church. So I called and asked if they could check and see if Leo
had ever been baptized. It turns out he had, in 1984. But they had lost track
of him, so they had assigned him to what the Church refers to as an
“administrative unit,” a ward that exists only on a computer where lost members
reside until they are found. I have to assume that Leo, like Josephine, didn’t
stay with Mormonism.
________________
1. Edward L. Kimball, “Spencer W. Kimball and the Revelation
on Priesthood,” BYU Studies 47, no. 2
(2008): 5–78. Available for download at https://byustudies.
byu.edu/content/spencer-w-kimball-and-revelation-priesthood.
2. Church architect Richard Jackson, quoted in Gregory A.
Prince and Wm. Robert Wright, David O.
McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism (Salt Lake City: University of Utah
Press, 2005), 104.
3. Eugene England called for Latter-day Saints to prepare and
pray for the priesthood ban to be lifted. See his “The Mormon Cross,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 8,
no. 1 (1973): 78–86.
Had to fix the title on this. It was June 8 when the revelation was announced to all the General Authorities. It was Friday, June 9, when the public announcement was made.
ReplyDeleteThe members, not the Lord, were quite likely the reason for the delay.
ReplyDeleteTwo of them in particular--initials JFS and HBL. Had McKay acted prior to their presidencies, they could have thrown up all sorts of barriers (e.g., they can hold the Priesthood, but not serve in positions that require keys, etc.) that would have effectively negated the change.