Well, the circus
has started. I’ve been listening to the Republican National Convention in the
background tonight while bottling apricots (how domestic of me). Of course, you
can’t really take anything seriously that you hear in a political convention,
but so far, this one has been like an out-of-body experience. There’s a total
disconnect between the things the speakers have said about The Donald and the
things he has said during his campaign. It’s very much as if they are speaking
about someone else.
The convention, I
understand, started out with one last-gasp effort by many of the delegates (including
Utah’s Mike Lee) to dethrone Donald before he gets any closer to the crown. The
news networks referred to it as a “civil war” within the Republican Party. And
the metaphor is quite apropos. Donald Trump has divided the GOP in at least two
significant ways.
First, he has
actually done the Republican Party a favor in exposing a split that they
apparently weren’t even aware of. While the party elite were carrying on about
the “conservative” agenda, an ideology that all Republican politicians must
swallow whole, and were assuming that half the country was on board, Trump
ignored this agenda and showed the party ideologues that at least half of
Republican voters don’t really care about their precious conservative agenda.
They don’t care about supply-side economics. They don’t care about destroying
Obamacare. They don’t care about deregulating Wall Street. They don’t care
about easing restrictions on pollution. They don’t care about privatizing
Social Security. They don’t care about a whole lot of things the party elite are
devoted to. Frankly, they are rather uneducated and unsophisticated. They are
merely angry, because they have been taught to be angry. Much of it is
unfocused anger, but Trump has harnessed that anger and focused it toward a few
peripheral issues, like illegal immigration, and made that the central thrust
of his campaign.
In a sense, Trump
has hijacked the Republican Party and left the former party elite on the
outside. He isn’t interested in a lot of the issues that drive Paul Ryan and
Mitch McConnell. And his followers aren’t either. This creates a real dilemma
for those who are now outsiders. What happens if Trump wins? If so, then their
agenda is pretty much dead. Not that much of it made any sense in the first
place. Supply-side economics and tax cuts for the wealthy have produced
disastrous results. Scientific evidence supporting human-caused global warming
is becoming so overwhelming that the GOP looks foolish denying it. Their
devotion to the NRA vision of gun control is opposed by a vast majority of
their own constituents. Paul Ryan finally came out with the long-promised
Republican health-care alternative to Obamacare, but the experts who have
looked at it claim that, once again, Ryan left out too many details, but those
details he did include indicate that it would be an unmitigated disaster.
Increasing an already bloated military and greedy military-industrial complex
makes little sense. And on down the list. So, the conservative agenda is
revealing itself to be fairly vacuous, and Trump is helping to nail its coffin
shut.
And if Trump
loses, the party elite, who will once again return to center stage, have to figure
out a new agenda that actually appeals not just to the ideologically pure
tea-party types, but also to the mass of undereducated, disenfranchised people
Trump has attracted. It may be that if he loses, they may just say “to hell
with it” and totally lose interest in empty GOP promises. If their
authoritarian savior is rejected by the American people, they may simply drop
out of the picture and never vote again. What good would it do? If Trump can’t
win, then nobody who will “fix” everything could be elected.
This is the first
split Trump has helped create (or has exposed). The second wedge he has driven
into the GOP base is his opposition to free trade and his threats of trade wars,
which places him, oddly, closer to Bernie Sanders than to the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce. And his rhetoric here has scared the pants off the traditionally
Republican corporate sector. Many large corporations are refusing to
financially support the GOP convention, and many voices in the business world
are in opposition to Trump. But Trump’s angry supporters are once again following
his lead, which creates yet another split in the Republican Party.
The question is,
can the GOP survive Trump’s candidacy, whether he wins or loses? Trump is
creating so many dilemmas for the Republican Party he has hijacked. He is so
unpopular among the party elite that many of them are simply staying away from
the convention. Many, like Utah’s Mia Love, are staying away because being
connected in any way to Trump might sink her chances for reelection. Others,
like Mitt Romney, are staying away on principle. Still others are holding their
noses and supporting him because he is the new face of the party, and party
loyalty trumps everything (sorry for the pun). But will their support of Trump
damage their credibility and electability in the future? If I were a
Republican, I would certainly think twice about voting for someone who caved in
and supported Trump.
After the
resounding defeat of Romney in 2012, the Republican Party commissioned an
autopsy to figure out what went wrong and what they needed to do to win the
presidency in 2016. The recommendations were pretty obvious. High on the list
was to cease being the party of the rich, the white, and the elderly.
Demographics in the United States are shifting steadily away from older white
men toward a multiethnic mix. The GOP needed to appeal to more women and more
ethnic minorities. Trump has pretty much singlehandedly dragged the Republican
Party in the opposite direction and in the process has revealed an ugly racist,
xenophobic, misogynist underbelly in the Republican base. In 2020, it will be
that much harder for the GOP to change directions, partly because it is now
common knowledge that a rather sizable majority of Republican voters share the
bigotry Trump has brazenly advertised. How do you appeal to those people and at
the same time appeal to the people they despise? This is a seemingly impossible
task.
Personally, I
used to be a Republican. I hate to admit that I voted for George W. Bush in
2000. But after a couple of years of his presidency, I could see where the
party was headed, and I bailed. I was unaffiliated for quite a few years, but
last year I registered as a Democrat because I was voting almost exclusively
for Democratic candidates. I have not regretted this decision for one minute.
As a Mormon, I have far fewer ethical dilemmas as a Democrat. Their view of
government as a tool to help individuals and society rather than as a problem
to oppose and be angry about simply feels more reasonable. Their stands on such
topics as global warming and gun control are more rational and realistic. And
my belief that the real danger to our freedom comes from the corporate economy
and not from government is totally incompatible with Republican rhetoric.
So, as a former
Republican, it is somewhat disconcerting to watch the disintegration of the
GOP. It has become extremist on one hand and angry and irrational on the other.
It may split in any of several ways, but I don’t relate to any of the factions.
And this troubles me. I believe that a strong two-party system, with
differences but with the ability to compromise and work together, is the ideal
form of government. But the GOP has gone off the deep end in so many ways, and
it refuses to compromise on so many issues, that it appears GOP now stands for
Grand Obstructionist Party. For the past eight years, it has defined itself as
simply the party that opposes everything President Obama proposes. And now it
is being led by an egomaniac who doesn’t really have a coherent agenda for
governing. He is shallow and vindictive and frighteningly impulsive. Whether
the Republican Party can survive Donald Trump and its own recent history is a
question only time can answer.
The US population is almost at critical mass for choosing unwisely and perhaps fatally. I can't watch anymore. I'm speaking of all parties, religions, and creeds.
ReplyDeleteI do think that in some ways Trump is helpful for various groups in the GOP remembering it is a coalition. The last 10 - 20 years has had an echo-chamber kind of thing going on where people don't realize everyone doesn't think like them. (I think that's been happening to Dems too, although not nearly to the same degree)
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately though this doesn't change the incentives for House members form whom gerrymandered districts mean their biggest worries are the few people excited enough to attend early primaries or caucuses and offer challenges there. The solutions are more intelligent districts (although this would then affect black congress members in many areas -- people forget what started the gerrymandering). The other solution are primary reforms to force primaries to engage more people. (Similar to some of California's reforms perhaps - although I think it's too early to see how they are turning out)
BTW - I think you're wrong on the NRA issue. I don't quite understand why people think the NRA has much power. The issue is that for many people they think along those lines and those are among the most important issues they vote on. Where the majority of the GOP differs from the NRA is pretty minor and bears no resemblance to where media or Democratic elites are relative to gun control. Also views on gun control vary significantly regionally. If you live on the coasts (excepting south east) you're for gun control. With a few exceptions if you live in red states people overwhelmingly are against gun control. The GOP just reflects those realities.
ReplyDelete