One of the common
refrains we hear from Republican politicians and conservative commentators is
that Americans are being overtaxed. Our taxes are among the highest in the
world, if you believe the rhetoric. This line of argument is being used to
promote terminating the inheritance tax, eliminating the payroll tax, adopting
a single-rate tax system, and reducing income, capital gains, and business tax
rates.
Another refrain is
that the federal debt is at crisis levels and must be reduced. Since we are
already overtaxed, the only way to deal with this is to shrink government
spending. As I mentioned last week, if you want to reduce government spending,
you are going to have to deal with Social Security, Medicare, and the military.
The rest of the budget is pocket change, relatively speaking. But since
Republicans want to increase military spending, their primary target for saving
money is what they call “entitlements,” which include Social Security,
Medicare, food stamps, CHIP, unemployment compensation, and veterans programs.
Some Republicans are
so up in arms about the “debt crisis” that they want to pass a balanced budget
amendment. How they plan on balancing the budget while cutting taxes is a
mystery. Maybe we can use Paul Ryan’s magic asterisks. To put this in
perspective, in 2015 the deficit was $439 billion, the smallest it has been
since 2007. Still, cutting $439 billion in government spending would be quite a
hatchet job and would certainly plunge the economy into another major
recession. So that pipe dream ain’t gonna come true. At any rate, no Republican
politician is going to seriously try to cut Social Security or Medicare, not
with the Baby Boomers retiring in droves and most of them without any
retirement savings to speak of.
In spite of the
facts, though, every one of the 31,000 or so GOP presidential candidates vowed
to cut taxes, especially on the wealthy. Estimates for the carnage ranged from
$9.5 trillion over its first 10 years for Trump’s plan (and another $15 trillion
in its second decade) on down to about $6.8 trillion for Rubio. Of course the
estimates vary widely, depending on various assumptions. But all the plans had
two things in common: the debt would balloon by trillions and the wealthy would
make off like bandits.
So, if we do want
to reduce the national debt (and that wouldn’t be a terrible idea), we need to
look at increasing taxes. Well, what’s the truth about our tax burden as
Americans? I’ll copy a chart here from the Citizens for Tax Justice website.
Oh my! Can this
be accurate? Of the countries belonging to the OECD (Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development), only Chile and Mexico tax less than the United
States? Well, yes. We’re overtaxed? Gee, try to sell that whopper in Denmark.
By the way, the numbers behind this chart include all federal, state, and local
taxes.
So, let’s look at
the U.S. over the 32 years stretching from 1979 to 2010. The following chart
compares U.S. tax receipts with the average of our OECD friends.
A couple of
trends are notable. First, our OECD partners’ taxes have increased slowly over
time, but by less than 2 percent in 32 years. Second, U.S. tax revenues peaked
during the end of the Clinton presidency (remember, when we ran a budget
surplus). Second, the Bush tax cuts had an immediate and predictable effect.
Tax revenues dropped from a high of 29.5 percent just before Bush took office
to a low of 26.3 percent in 2008. We can throw out 2009 as an anomaly because
the Great Recession skewed the numbers. Supply-side dogma insists that cutting
taxes will increase growth, and Republican politicians are still trying to sell
that snake oil after three decades of proof that it just. does. not. happen.
Consequently, when you take steady spending (which is basically what we have
had over the years, despite Republican the-sky-is-falling rhetoric), stir in
reduced tax revenue, add a major recession, and fold in two pinches of unfunded
wars, you have the perfect recipe for, well, ballooning debt.
So, where are we
now? The latest comparative numbers for OECD countries were for 2010. In 2015,
though, the federal government collected $3.25 trillion in taxes. State and
local taxes collected were $1.33 trillion. Total tax revenue, then, was $4.58
trillion. GDP for 2015 was about $17.9 trillion. This means tax revenue was
25.5 percent of GDP. Still 4 percent below our 2000 revenues . . . and about 22
percent below Denmark.
Anyway, next time
you hear a politician or a talk radio personality complaining about how horribly
high our taxes are, remember the numbers and say, “Nice try. Do your homework.”
No comments:
Post a Comment