Some readers have
accused the Book of Mormon of being misogynistic. I mean, what else can you
conclude about a narrative of over 500 pages that mentions only six women by
name? And three of them are biblical figures—Eve, Sarah, and Mary—who aren’t
even in the story. So really only three women among the Lehites merit having
their names mentioned by the Nephite chroniclers: mother Sariah, the Lamanite
servant woman Abish, and the harlot Isabel. That’s it. Nephi mentions his wife
and sisters, but they are not important enough to identify by name, which makes
them even less significant than his brother Sam, a perfectly inconsequential
character in the story. And so it goes throughout the chronicle. Women are
sometimes identified, but almost never by name.
Maybe misogynist is the wrong word, though.
The Book of Mormon chroniclers aren’t hostile toward women. They just dismiss
them as largely irrelevant. Some modern women apologists have come to the defense
of Nephi and his fellow scribes by pointing out how many times women are actually
mentioned in the history. And there are indeed a few instances where they play
a supporting role in the drama, but if you look for their names in the
playbill, you won’t find them.
Never is a woman
the main character in any subplot in the larger story. Perhaps the closest a
woman comes to headlining a scene is the wife of King Lamoni. She is a strong
woman, a woman with power, but still a woman without a name. For some odd
reason, her servant, Abish, gets her name in the record. But the queen herself?
Not so lucky.
I would like to
suggest, though, that although women appear to be neglected in the Book of
Mormon narrative, this may be largely a Nephite thing. Think about it. Almost
all the prominent women in the chronicle are Lamanite women, especially if they
are positive figures. Reading between the lines, it’s fairly easy to see not
only that Nephite society was overly patriarchal, but also that Lamanite
society was much less so.
The distinction
comes early. Jacob points out that the Lamanite men have avoided the sin of
seeking after plural wives and concubines, a sin for which he castigates the
Nephite men. So even at that early date the Lamanites apparently regarded their
women more highly than the Nephites did. This becomes even more obvious later
in the record. Lamoni’s wife is not just a central character; she is a woman
who holds power and influence. This high status of the Lamanite queens can be
seen again in the story of Amalickiah. When the Nephite traitor schemes to
usurp power among the Lamanites, he first kills the king, but he apparently cannot
assume the kingship himself until he wins over the queen and marries her.
By contrast,
consider the queens of the Nephites. Um, what queens? It is never mentioned in
the record that Benjamin or Mosiah had a wife. We only assume this information
because we are told that they had sons. No daughters are mentioned, but that
does not mean they did not exist. Just like their mothers, they are invisible. And
this pattern holds true for the chief judges and the high priests and military
leaders. Alma apparently had a wife, and so did Helaman and Pahoran and Captain
Moroni and the younger Helaman and Nephi and his son Nephi, but we only assume
this because we are told that these men had sons. Their wives are never
mentioned.
Now consider the
other story in the book1 where women play a crucial role—the account
of the stripling warriors and their mothers, who taught them great faith. Guess
what? These women were Lamanites. Of course they were. All the strong women in
the Book of Mormon are Lamanites. The only Nephite woman who plays a prominent
role in the story from the death of Sariah to the destruction of the Nephites
is a whore. Mosiah never consults his wife when their sons ask permission to go
on a seventeen-year mission to the Lamanites. We don’t read about Alma’s wife
when he went off on his travels to set the church in order. Same with Helaman’s
sons, Nephi and Lehi, when they set off to convert the Lamanites. When the
younger Helaman occupies the judgment seat, there is no mention of Mrs.
Helaman. The only woman who gets any airtime is the harlot Isabel. Apparently
marrying a prophet doesn’t get you in the news, but seducing a prophet’s son
sure does.
All this makes me
wonder what the Book of Mormon story would be like if it had been written by
the Lamanites. Undoubtedly it would be a fascinating tale with a far different
spin than we get in the Nephite version. And undoubtedly more women would have
names. Oddly, this may be the only known case where the victors didn’t get to
write the history.
_______________________
1.
Of course I am ignoring the Jaredites here, because their society and history
were totally separate from the Nephites and Lamanites.
I think the Lamanites are often the most righteous people in the book. In many ways we get a somewhat distorted view of the Lamanites. (Partially due to the Nephites recording history, possibly due to Mormon who had just watched the Lamanites wipe out his people) It's worth noting that it takes Christ explicitly demanding the Nephites mention prophet Samuel the Lamanite for him to even get into their histories.
ReplyDeleteI did a close reading of the Book of Mormon for everything it has about women for an essay in RBBM 10/2 back in 1998. Among other things, I found that "unlike the Bible, the Book of Mormon never makes proscriptive statements with respect to women’s roles. In the course of delivering his message, Mormon describes his culture, but never circumscribes ours."
ReplyDeleteAnd I noticed that
When Women Move to the Foreground "Given that the Book of Mormon doesn’t often mention individual women, what can we learn from those instances when it does? In researching this essay, we have realized that when women move from the background to the foreground in the Book of Mormon they typically do so for three reasons:
* to highlight profoundly archetypal situations
* to show the mutual dependence and independent agency of men and women
* to emphasize that the promises and obligations of the gospel apply equally to men and women
There is a consistency and deliberation in this on the part of the authors that suggests a positive intent and attitude."
Kevin Christensen